Government Failed To Complete Environmental Impact

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe won a significant victory today in its fight to protect the Tribe’s drinking water and ancestral lands from the Dakota Access pipeline.

A federal judge ruled that the federal permits authorizing the pipeline to cross the Missouri River just upstream of the Standing Rock reservation, which were hastily issued by the Trump administration just days after the inauguration, violated the law in certain critical respects.

In a 91-page decision, Judge James Boasberg wrote, the Court agrees that [the Corps] did not adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice, or the degree to which the pipeline’s effects are likely to be highly controversial.

The Court did not determine whether pipeline operations should be shut off and has requested additional briefing on the subject and a status conference next week.

This is a major victory for the Tribe and we commend the courts for upholding the law and doing the right thing,said Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II in a recent statement.The previous administration painstakingly considered the impacts of this pipeline, and President Trump hastily dismissed these careful environmental considerations in favor of political and personal interests.

Dakota Access Pipeline and democracy

We applaud the courts for protecting our laws and regulations from undue political influence and will ask the Court to shut down pipeline operations immediately.

The Tribe’s inspiring and courageous fight has attractedinternational attentionand drawn the support of hundreds of tribes around the nation.

The Tribe is represented by the nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice, which filed a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for issuing a permit for the pipeline construction in violation of several environmental laws.

This decision marks an important turning point. Until now, the rights of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe have been disregarded by the builders of the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Trump administration-prompting a well-deserved global outcry,said Earthjustice attorney Jan Hasselman. The federal courts have stepped in where our political systems have failed to protect the rights of Native communities.

Dakota Access Pipeline

The Court ruled against the Tribe on several other issues, finding that the reversal allowing the pipeline complied with the law in some respects.Following the Court’s order, on July 17, DAPL and the Army Corps filed briefs explaining why the pipeline should not be shut down pending the new environmental analysis is undertaken. Proposed amicus briefs were also filed by the North Dakota Petroleum Council and a coalition of industry groups.

The Corps’ brief also provides for the first time some additional details about the process to review the flaws in its previous environmental assessment, anticipating a process that would be completed by December of 2017. The Corps does not commit either to performing an EIS or even providing opportunities for publiccomment.

The $3.8 billion pipeline project, also known as Bakken Oil Pipeline, extends 1,168 miles across North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois, crossing through communities, farms, tribal land, sensitive natural areas and wildlife habitat. The pipeline would carry up to 570,000 barrels a day of crude oil from the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota to Illinois where it links with another pipeline that will transport the oil to terminals and refineries along the Gulf of Mexico.

Public Affairs News

PR firm Phoenix

Crossbow Communications is a full-serviceadvertising agencyandpublic relations firminDenver, ColoradoandPhoenix, Arizona. ThePR firmspecializes in issue management and public affairs. Write to Gary Chandler to learn more how we can help build your brand, your bottom line and a better